Self insured employers may have experienced cases where an injured worker declines to attend a medical examination by the Medical Panel upon legal advice. There is a school of thought amongst lawyers acting for injured workers that the relevant sections of the Workers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act, 1986, are invalid and /or do not grant compensating authorities the power to refer medical questions to the Medical Panel.

Such a situation arose in the matter of Yaghoubi V Employers Mutual Limited which we reported in the Winter edition of the DWReport. In that case, EML had rejected the worker’s claim and, after the worker disputed the rejection, EML attempted to refer the question of whether or not the alleged disability was compensable to the Medical Panel. The worker declined to attend before the Medical Panel upon legal advice.

Initially, the Workers Compensation Tribunal found that the compensating authority had no power to refer the medical question to the Medical Panel as the dispute had progressed past the conciliation stage to Judicial Determination. The implication of the decision was that the referral to the Medical Panel would have been valid if it had been made during the conciliation stage of proceedings.

EML appealed to the Full Bench of the Workers Compensation Tribunal.

We can now advise that the Full Bench has referred this matter to the Full Bench of the Supreme Court of South Australia for determination of certain questions of law. It is possible that the Supreme Court might consider this matter and publish its decision before the end of 2010.

While the Supreme Court’s response should provide an answer to the question of whether a compensating authority can refer medical questions which are the subject of a dispute before the Workers Compensation Tribunal to the Medical Panel, it is unlikely to provide an answer to the wider question of a compensating authority’s power to refer questions to the Medical Panel in the context of case management. That issue will likely have to await another day and another dispute.

We will report to you on the Supreme Court’s decision, and the implications of that decision for self insured employers, as soon as the Supreme Court delivers its judgement.

This communication provides general information which is current as at the time of production. The information contained in this communication does not constitute advice and should not be relied upon as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Should you wish to discuss any matter raised in this article, or what it means for you, your business or your clients' businesses, please feel free to contact us.

For more information, please contact...

John Walsh

View Profile →

Related Articles

View All News
April 02, 2024 Introducing DW Fox Tucker Lawyers Newest Director
Firm News Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
December 20, 2023 Seriously Injured Workers and the Obligation of Mutuality
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
October 19, 2023 Bridging the Gap: New Director Enhances Workers Compensation Practice
Firm News Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
September 27, 2023 Workers Compensation in South Australia: Has Malinauskas Kicked an Own Goal?
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
July 17, 2023 Section 18: A Solution Looking for a Problem
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
July 07, 2023 Significant Changes to the Obligation to Provide Suitable Employment Ahead
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
June 09, 2022 Return to Work SA’s Summer of Discontent May Soon Be Over
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
February 01, 2022 The Cost of Workers Compensation in an Ageing Workforce
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
January 14, 2022 Learning to Live With COVID-19 - The Trolley Dilemma in Our Economy
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Workers Compensation & Self Insurance Agribusiness + 3
December 16, 2021 Summerfield, Opioids and Rising Workers Compensation Premiums – What’s the Connection?
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
October 26, 2021 Obligations Under the Return to Work Act 2014 (SA): All for One, but Not Necessarily One for All!
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
June 30, 2021 Workers Compensation, Health and Safety and COVID-19
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
May 14, 2021 Evaluating the Cause(s) of Impairments Comes Down to “Common Sense”
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
December 16, 2020 All for One and One for All!
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
April 10, 2020 Staff Profile: John Walsh
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance Staff Profiles
April 02, 2020 Managing Your Workforce in a Stand Down
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
February 26, 2020 The Opioid Crisis in Australia
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
February 12, 2020 Assessor or Adjudicator?
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
November 26, 2019 The Opioid Crisis in America
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance
November 21, 2019 Impairment Assessments and Section 22 of the Return to Work Act 2014 (SA)
Workers Compensation & Self Insurance