Statutes Amendment (Health Information) Bill 2013

A Bill currently before Parliament has the potential to significantly limit an employer’s ability to seek medical information about their staff, and should be of concern to all employers.

The Statutes Amendment (Health Information) Bill 2013 aims to regulate the circumstances in which an employer can require an employee to submit to a medical examination, or seek medical information from an employee.

The potential effect of the Bill upon employers in the context of workers compensation, work health and safety, and industrial matters, is considerable. .

The Bill would apply to independent contractors, as well as employees.  Accordingly, I will use the term “worker” below to refer to employees and contractors.

The Bill provides that an employer can only direct a worker to submit to a medical examination, or provide medical information, if the employer has a belief, based on reasonable grounds that – because of illness or injury – the worker is unfit to undertake the inherent requirements of their position (or of any modified duties they are performing), or that the performance of those duties would constitute a risk to the worker’s health and safety. In this regard, we believe that the Bill is not particularly controversial as, arguably, it simply restates (and perhaps slightly expands) an employer’s current obligation pursuant to common law.

The Bill also requires an employer to give written notice of any direction requiring a worker to attend a medical examination, and to set out the reasons the examination is necessary. This goes beyond employers’ current obligations at common law but, in our view, is not inappropriate or exceedingly onerous.

In addition, the Bill provides that an employer or their representative can only attend the medical examination with the worker’s permission.  We do not think that this is necessarily inappropriate, as long as it does not interfere with the role of Rehabilitation and Return to Work Coordinators or Rehabilitation Consultants under the Workers Rehabilitation and Compensation Act, 1986.

In our view, the real issue of concern for employers is that the Bill provides that an employer does not have the right to nominate the medical expert who will conduct the examination of the worker.  This means that an employer will be bound to accept the opinion of any medical expert the worker chooses to consult, and will have no ability to question that opinion, or seek a second, independent, opinion.

While we do not intend to disparage or question the expertise of treating doctors, in our experience, sometimes - because of their therapeutic relationship with the worker -  treating doctors might apply a less rigorous critical approach to questions of a worker’s capacity, and might be more inclined to accept without question subjective reports provided by the worker.

In our view, if an employer has genuine and reasonable concerns about a worker’s ability to undertake certain duties,   that employer should not be limited to accepting the evidence of the worker’s doctors, and should be able to seek an opinion from a doctor of their own choosing.

Employers rightly bear a heavy responsibility to ensure the health and safety of their workers, and “officers” of employers can be held personally liable for any failure to comply with this obligation.  In these circumstances, employers should have the right to:

  • seek medical opinions from experts of their choosing;
  • question any medical evidence provided; and
  • seek and secure independent and alternative opinions if they think it necessary.

Any attempt to limit an employer’s right to do so should be resisted.

The interaction of the Bill with other legislation is unclear, and raises a number of questions:

  • will the Bill affect the current right of self insured employers to request independent medical examinations of workers compensation claimants, or for registered employers to request that the claims agent arrange independent medical examinations?
  • pursuant to the Work Health and Safety Regulations, from January 2014, some employers will have a positive obligation to provide regular audiometric testing for some workers –  will it be the case that such employers will be unable to choose the provider who conducts the testing?
  • Will the Bill affect pre-employment medical examinations?

Another issue of concern with the Bill is that it does not allow for considerations of the health and safety of other workers to be taken into account.  That is, it is only a belief in potential risk to the health and safety of the individual worker which would entitle an employer to require a medical examination - a reasonable belief that the health and safety of other workers might be at risk would not, according to the Bill, suffice.

This Bill should be of considerable concern to employers and their officers, particularly in light of work health and safety obligations, and the heavy penalties which apply for failure to comply with those obligations.

This Bill, and the potential limit it places upon an employer’s right to seek medical information about their employees – stands in contrast to recent amendments to the Queensland Workers Compensation and Rehabilitation Act, 2003. The Queensland amendments enable employers to seek disclosures from prospective workers about prior injuries or conditions, and to obtain their workers compensation history, and imposes sanctions against workers who fail to do so and subsequently aggravate any non-disclosed injury or condition.  The amendments to the Queensland legislation will make it easier for employers in that state to comply with their workplace health and safety obligations, while the Bill will arguably make it more difficult for South Australian employers to do so.

This communication provides general information which is current as at the time of production. The information contained in this communication does not constitute advice and should not be relied upon as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Should you wish to discuss any matter raised in this article, or what it means for you, your business or your clients' businesses, please feel free to contact us.

For more information, please contact...

Ben Duggan

View Profile →

Related Articles

View All News
December 20, 2023 Workplace Criminalisation: Labor Governments Criminalise Workplace Manslaughter and Wage Theft
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
December 05, 2023 It’s Time to Fix Your Fixed-Term Contracts!
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
November 28, 2023 Payroll Tax and Medical Practices: An Update and Warning to Others
Tax Health & Aged Care Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
September 15, 2023 Payroll Tax and Medical Practices
Tax Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Health & Aged Care
September 11, 2023 Taking Reasonable Care to Ensure Your Acts or Omissions Don’t Land You in Court
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
September 11, 2023 Advertising Health Services
Corporate & Commercial Health & Aged Care
September 06, 2023 Hospitality and Retail Brace for Impact
Hospitality Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
August 28, 2023 Guidelines: Telehealth Consultations With Patients
Insurance & Risk Management Health & Aged Care
August 02, 2023 Increase in Minimum Award Rates of Pay
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
July 05, 2023 Collaborating With Robots in the Workplace
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
June 08, 2023 Landmark Decision: Fair Work Commission Implements Historic Minimum Wage Hike
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
June 05, 2023 From Fixed Term to Permanent
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
May 01, 2023 Countdown to the End of Zombie Agreements: Is Your Business Compliant?
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
November 03, 2022 Pivot in Enforcement Strategy to Create Safer Workplaces
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
July 12, 2022 Personal and Confidential Information: Employer Obligations to Employees
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Intellectual Property (IP)
June 24, 2022 Federal Labor Government to Regulate to Achieve Its Aim of Job Security
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
June 17, 2022 Fair Work Minimum Wage Review Significantly Increases Minimum Wage Rates
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety
May 11, 2022 Health Sector: Preparing for the End of State-Imposed COVID-19 Vaccination Mandates
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Health & Aged Care
March 25, 2022 SA Labor to Apply Criminal Law to Workplaces Under its Industrial Relations Policy
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Agribusiness Defence + 7
March 04, 2022 Why We Should Avoid the Use of the Word “Mandate” When Communicating Vaccination Requirements to Workers and the Wider Community
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Health & Aged Care Agribusiness + 3