If your business produces or deals in food or beverages, then the European Union’s (EU) requests regarding Geographical Indications (GIs) as part of Australia’s free-trade negotiations with the EU could have an impact. A GI is a name that indicates that a product has a specific geographical origin or connection.

Australia is currently in negotiations with the EU over the treatment of EU GIs. As one of its key objectives, the EU have listed 172 agricultural/foodstuff names and 236 spirit names for which they are seeking protection as GIs in Australia. The requested EU GI list can be accessed by clicking here. Some notable (and obvious) examples are:

Food

  • Brie de Meaux
  • Camembert de Normandie
  • Roquefort
  • Καλαμάτα (Kalamata) (in relation to Olive Oil)
  • Φέτα (Feta)
  • Gorgonzola
  • Mortadella Bologna
  • Parmigiano Reggiano
  • Taleggio
  • Edam Holland
  • Gouda Holland
  • Scotch Beef
  • Scotch Lamb
  • White Stilton Cheese
  • Blue Stilton Cheese

Spirits

  • Calvados
  • Cognac
  • Irish Cream
  • Irish Whiskey
  • Grappa
  • Scotch Whisky

Many of the GIs are not likely to be used, but we recommend that you check the full list.

The EU has said that protection is not sought for those of the above names which are underlined when used by themselves. Thus, use of these names is permitted, as long as they are not used in a way that may deceive or mislead consumers as to the true origin or quality of the product.

The protections the EU is seeking is that the GIs not be used commercially on comparable products or, in some cases, as an ingredient. Specific provisions are proposed to prevent circumvention of the rules by using wording such as “imitation”, “flavour”, “like” and similar phrases with the GI, such as “produced like Edam Holland”. The EU also seeks to restrict packaging and advertising and other practices that are false or may mislead a consumer as to the true origin of a product or ingredient. It does not appear that any similar requests for protection of any Australian GIs in relation to food have been made by Australia.

The Australian Government, through the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), is seeking input from traders who might be using any of the proposed protected GIs whether they be retailers, restaurants, bakers, caterers or food manufacturers. If you think protection of any of the EU GIs on the list will adversely affect your interests you can lodge an objection using the template provided by DFAT. The objection needs to meet specified grounds and supporting evidence such as packaging and menus will be required. There is a deadline for submitting an objection of 13 November 2019. The link to the DFAT webpage for objections procedure and the template document can be accessed by clicking here.

If you think this might affect you and wish to make an objection we will be happy to assist.

This communication provides general information which is current as at the time of production. The information contained in this communication does not constitute advice and should not be relied upon as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Should you wish to discuss any matter raised in this article, or what it means for you, your business or your clients' businesses, please feel free to contact us.

For more information, please contact...

Sandy Donaldson

View Profile →

Amy Bishop

View Profile →

Related Articles

View All News
April 18, 2024 2025 Edition of Best Lawyers: Celebrating Our Leaders and a Rising Star
Firm News Corporate & Commercial Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety + 6
December 20, 2023 Is a Trade Mark License a Franchise?
Intellectual Property (IP)
December 20, 2023 Trade Mark Use/Copyright and Fair Dealing – AGL v Greenpeace
Intellectual Property (IP)
July 12, 2022 Personal and Confidential Information: Employer Obligations to Employees
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Intellectual Property (IP)
May 02, 2022 Privacy Week - Top Tips
Corporate & Commercial Intellectual Property (IP)
March 30, 2022 Domain Names and Cyber Security
Corporate & Commercial Intellectual Property (IP)
August 17, 2021 Music to Artists' Ears: Palmer to Pay Up Big for "Flagrant" Copyright Infringement
Intellectual Property (IP)
June 30, 2021 When are Directors Liable for Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Passing off, Trade Mark Infringement or Unconscionable Conduct?
Corporate & Commercial Dispute Resolution & Insolvency Intellectual Property (IP)
June 30, 2021 NFT’s Explained: The Intellectual Property Implications of Licencing Digital Assets Through Blockchain
Intellectual Property (IP)
September 21, 2020 Fee Increases for Trade Marks
Intellectual Property (IP)
April 10, 2020 “Confidential” Means Confidential
Intellectual Property (IP)
April 10, 2020 Who Owns Intellectual Property? Employer or Employee
Intellectual Property (IP)
October 25, 2019 EU’s Request for Geographical Indications Protection may Affect your Products or Trade Marks
Intellectual Property (IP) International Business
September 25, 2019 Direct Marketing and Data Sharing: Shahin v BP Australia
Intellectual Property (IP)
September 25, 2019 Top Tips for Creating Your Trade Mark
Intellectual Property (IP)
September 25, 2019 Using the PPSR to Protect Your Deposit
Intellectual Property (IP)
June 21, 2019 Registration of Everything (Commonwealth) Bill
Intellectual Property (IP)
November 07, 2018 Parallel Universes Converge: Trade Mark Act Amendments
Intellectual Property (IP)
November 07, 2018 Branding for WET
Intellectual Property (IP) Tax Wine
July 04, 2018 Do You Own Your Trade Mark?
Intellectual Property (IP)