You are a director of a company. You and the other director provide a guarantee to the bank for the company’s debts.

The company fails and the bank demands payment of the debt, $1million.

You dispute your liability as guarantor and the bank settles with you for $100,000 with the bank covenanting not to sue you for any further amount. You feel relieved to have resolved the demand in this way.

However, the recent decision by the High Court in Lavin v Toppi [2015] HCA 4 has confirmed that this may not be the end of the matter. Your fellow director, who ended up paying the rest of the debt, may be able to recover a further $400,000 from you - being your share of the residual amount of the guaranteed debt.

Under a joint and several guarantee given to a creditor, the creditor can recover all the debt, or any part of it, from any one or more of the guarantors. The creditor is not bound to pursue all guarantors, nor is it bound to obtain an equal amount from each guarantor. Therefore, the bank can settle with you for $100,000 and chase your other director for the balance.

However, between themselves the guarantors are bound to contribute to the debt equally – known as the right to contribution. If they do not contribute to the debt equally then legal action may be taken by an “over payer“ against an “under payer” to recover the amount of the overpayment.

The right to contribution in the matter of Lavin v Toppi was held by the High Court to not be affected by the deal done by the guarantor with the bank.

This communication provides general information which is current as at the time of production. The information contained in this communication does not constitute advice and should not be relied upon as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Should you wish to discuss any matter raised in this article, or what it means for you, your business or your clients' businesses, please feel free to contact us.

For more information, please contact...

Christopher Knott

View Profile →

Related Articles

View All News
December 20, 2023 New Reasons to Keep Your Contract Terms Fair
Corporate & Commercial
December 20, 2023 Deeds vs Agreements
Corporate & Commercial
December 20, 2023 When Can You Send Unsolicited Electronic Messages?
Corporate & Commercial
September 11, 2023 Advertising Health Services
Corporate & Commercial Health & Aged Care
October 14, 2022 Lessons From Theranos
Corporate & Commercial
October 12, 2022 Vendor Safety Nets
Corporate & Commercial
October 06, 2022 Bind Games
Corporate & Commercial
May 02, 2022 Privacy Week - Top Tips
Corporate & Commercial Intellectual Property (IP)
March 30, 2022 Domain Names and Cyber Security
Corporate & Commercial Intellectual Property (IP)
March 29, 2022 Are You a Director Who Still Needs to Get Your Director ID?
Corporate & Commercial
September 20, 2021 Termination of the Naval Group’s Australian Contract: What It Means for Local Subcontractors
Corporate & Commercial Defence
June 30, 2021 When are Directors Liable for Misleading or Deceptive Conduct, Passing off, Trade Mark Infringement or Unconscionable Conduct?
Corporate & Commercial Dispute Resolution & Insolvency Intellectual Property (IP)
January 20, 2021 Terms and Conditions for Sale of Goods/Incoterms® 2020 and Vienna Convention
Corporate & Commercial
December 16, 2020 King Reigns All: High Court Decides Holding Companies May Be Held Accountable for Subsidiary Company Actions
Corporate & Commercial Dispute Resolution & Insolvency
December 16, 2020 Building and Construction Contracts: The Importance of Good Contract Administration
Corporate & Commercial Dispute Resolution & Insolvency Property
June 09, 2020 COVID-19: Companies Given the Temporary Right to E-Sign Agreements
Corporate & Commercial
May 21, 2020 COVID-19: Modern Slavery Statement Extension Granted
Corporate & Commercial
April 20, 2020 COVID-19: Transactions Involving Foreign Investment
Corporate & Commercial
April 10, 2020 The Covid-19 Outbreak and Contract Relief in the Form of Force Majeure
Corporate & Commercial
September 25, 2019 Modern Slavery in the Supply Chain
Corporate & Commercial