International Wills vs Concurrent Wills

Do you live in Australia and have assets overseas? What happens to the assets when you die?

Making a will is highly recommended, particularly if a person has substantial assets. The main reason is to ensure that, on death, the person’s assets are received by, or held for the benefit of, the person or persons that are intended by the deceased. If there is no will, the assets will be distributed in accordance with the laws of the country where they are situated.

In South Australia the estate of a person who dies without a valid will (an intestate estate) must be distributed as follows in the scenarios below (there are obviously other scenarios):

  • if there is a spouse (including a domestic partner) only, to the spouse;
  • if there is a spouse and children, the spouse is entitled to all of the estate if it does not exceed $100,000;
  • if the estate is more than $100,000, the spouse will receive $100,000, personal belongings and one half of the balance of the estate and children will be entitled to the rest in equal shares. The Public Trustee will hold the shares of the children until they are 18 years old.

This may not be what a person would wish for the distribution of their estate. The most common form of simple wills is for an estate to be left only to a surviving spouse, and not to children.

There are other benefits in making a will, as an application for probate of the will may be easier than an application for administration of an intestate estate. It is also possible to use wills for more creative estate planning such as testamentary trusts which may assist to retain assets within families and have taxation benefits.

Assets in Different Countries

It is becoming common for people to have substantial assets in different countries. In Australia, there are many people who live in Australia and have assets here, and also assets in another country, often their birth country, such as European countries, China and India.

When assets are held in different countries, or “jurisdictions”, very careful consideration may be required for the making of a will that deals with the assets in each jurisdiction.

Foreign wills

Each country has its own laws relating to the making of wills and to the distribution of intestate estates (if there is no will).

Most wills, if only a single will is made, relate to all of the property of the will-maker wherever it is situated. In many jurisdictions (including South Australia) a will that is validly made in another country may be accepted, but it will be necessary to prove that the will has been made in compliance with the internal law of the country where it is made.

In some countries, however, foreign wills may not be acceptable, or provisions of the foreign will may not be valid. For example, in some countries the concept of a trust, which is common in wills made in Australia, may not be recognised.

Wills for Assets in Different Countries

There are, generally, two methods of creating wills which are effective for assets in different countries. These are:

  • an international will; or
  • concurrent wills.

For reasons that are explained below, we suggest that concurrent wills will usually be the best solution.

International Wills

An international will is one which is made in accordance with the Convention Providing a Uniform Law on the Form of an International Will 1973. This is a Convention to which many countries, including Australia, are parties. In South Australia the Convention has the force of law under section 25G of the Wills Act 1936.

Under the Convention, a will that is made in accordance with the requirements of the Convention will be recognised in countries that are parties to the Convention. The requirements for a will in the Convention are substantially the same as the requirements for making a will in Australia. The main requirement in the Convention for an international will is that the signing of the will must be witnessed by three people:

  • two witnesses who must also sign the will; and
  • an authorised person who must sign both the will and a certificate in the form required by the Convention. In Australia, an authorised person is a notary public or a legal practitioner.

Although an international will may be accepted in other countries, it may still not be appropriate, or may not be clearly interpreted, particularly where the laws of the other country are different from the laws of the place where a will is made, or where there are language differences. It is very difficult to make a “one-size-fits-all” will.

Concurrent Wills

A better solution may be for a will-maker to prepare wills which apply separately in different countries. These are often called “concurrent wills”. It is possible to make a will which only applies to specific assets, or assets in a specific jurisdiction. If a will is made for Australian assets, this can be drawn by, or with assistance from, a lawyer in Australia so as to be appropriate for this jurisdiction. Another will may be drawn for property in another country, and it is advisable that this will should be drawn with assistance from a lawyer or notary who is familiar with the laws of that country.

It is possible for a number of concurrent wills to be created for different countries. Usually, one of the wills will relate to all of the property of the will-maker, wherever property is situated, other than property in each jurisdiction for which another concurrent will is made, so that if property is located in other countries that are not covered by a specific will, the general will should apply to that property.

A very practical advantage of concurrent wills, rather than one will (whether or not this is signed as an international will) is that application may be made for probate of each will in the country to which it applies. If there is only one will, it will be necessary for an application for probate to be made in one country and then for the probate to be resealed in each other country in which the will is required to be proven. The requirements for re-sealing may be complicated and will certainly take longer than a separate application for probate for separate concurrent wills.

If concurrent wills are made, very great care must be taken to ensure that these are each properly made and effective for the jurisdictions to which they apply. Usually, a will will revoke former wills that are made by the will-maker so that if concurrent wills are made it must be clear that each will does not revoke another concurrent will. It is particularly important to keep this in mind if the wills are made in different countries with the assistance of different advisors.

Making concurrent wills may be a somewhat complicated process, but it may be a very worthwhile process if the result is to give effect to the intentions of a will-maker. Concurrent wills may avoid many difficulties and unintended consequences for the distribution of the estate of the will-maker in different countries and thereby avoid or reduce costs which would otherwise apply.

This communication provides general information which is current as at the time of production. The information contained in this communication does not constitute advice and should not be relied upon as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Should you wish to discuss any matter raised in this article, or what it means for you, your business or your clients' businesses, please feel free to contact us.

For more information, please contact...

Sandy Donaldson

View Profile →

Mark Minarelli

View Profile →

Related Articles

View All News
April 27, 2020 COVID-19: Business Succession Planning
Wills & Estate Planning
April 10, 2020 Modern Issues in Business Succession Planning
Wills & Estate Planning
April 10, 2020 The Issue of Capacity
Wills & Estate Planning
October 25, 2019 EU’s Request for Geographical Indications Protection may Affect your Products or Trade Marks
Intellectual Property (IP) International Business
June 21, 2019 Succession Planning
Tax Wills & Estate Planning
November 09, 2018 “The Thorn Birds Between Two Roses”: Conflicting Wills
Wills & Estate Planning
November 07, 2018 “As Told by Hassold”: A Tale of Many Wills
Wills & Estate Planning
July 04, 2018 Wills: Greedy v Needy
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency Wills & Estate Planning
June 22, 2018 Making a Will
Wills & Estate Planning
June 22, 2018 Advance Care Directives
Wills & Estate Planning
June 22, 2018 Powers of Attorney
Wills & Estate Planning
March 26, 2018 Wills
Wills & Estate Planning
March 26, 2018 The Benefits of Incorporating a Testamentary Trust in Your Will
Wills & Estate Planning
December 21, 2017 In the Estate of Linda Vera Frencken (Deceased) [2017] SASC 160
Wills & Estate Planning
October 31, 2017 So You’ve Been Appointed as an Executor…….Now What?
Wills & Estate Planning
October 31, 2017 Succession Law: Tiburzi v Butler [2017] SASCFC 89 (28 July 2017)
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency Wills & Estate Planning
December 16, 2016 China and SA Now
International Business
December 16, 2016 Inheritance Disputes
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency Wills & Estate Planning
May 26, 2016 Wills for Different Countries
International Business Wills & Estate Planning
May 26, 2016 Aged Care - Estate Planning and Substitute Decision-Making
Health & Aged Care Wills & Estate Planning