As widely reported in the press, the Morrison Government is set to scrap exemptions to the rules against unfair contract terms for insurance companies acting on one of the 76 recommendations to come out of the Hayne Royal Commission. A new draft Bill has been produced relating to recommendation 4.7 which is to apply to Unfair Contract Terms (UCT) to insurance contracts, as well as to contracts in other sectors.

The UCT laws were introduced in 2010 and applied to sectors of the economy and business which used standard contracts; however, they have never been applied to insurers. The Royal Commissioner concluded that they should be.

Examples of “unfair” insurance contract terms which were considered included:

  • Home building insurance contracts that allowed the insurer to decide not to repair a building but rather pay a cash amount equivalent to the costs to the insurer of rebuilding or repairing the building as opposed to the actual costs of the repair which may well be higher if the insured had the work done independently of the insurer. 
  • Home building insurance contract provisions that permit an insurer to require the insurer to pay an excess before paying the claim.
  • Provisions in car insurance policies which require the insured, when making a claim, to provide the name, registration number and contact details of an uninsured at-fault driver.

It is anticipated that Treasurer Josh Frydenberg will boost public scrutiny of financial service providers by expanding the scope of chief executives who must appear at least once a year before the Parliament’s Standing Committee on Economics. As well as executives of the big four banks, executives of insurance and superannuation companies will be required to update the Committee on how they are going about implementation of the changes recommended by Commissioner Hayne.

We encourage businesses to review their current insurance contracts and contact us if you have any queries.

This communication provides general information which is current as at the time of production. The information contained in this communication does not constitute advice and should not be relied upon as such. Professional advice should be sought prior to any action being taken in reliance on any of the information. Should you wish to discuss any matter raised in this article, or what it means for you, your business or your clients' businesses, please feel free to contact us.

For more information, please contact...

Debra Lane

View Profile →

Related Articles

View All News
October 08, 2024 Exclusions in a House and Contents Policy: Are You Covered for Liability to a Tenant of a Granny Flat?
Insurance & Risk Management
August 28, 2023 Guidelines: Telehealth Consultations With Patients
Insurance & Risk Management Health & Aged Care
January 14, 2022 Learning to Live With COVID-19 - The Trolley Dilemma in Our Economy
Employment, Workplace Relations & Safety Workers Compensation & Self Insurance Agribusiness + 3
July 22, 2021 Business Interruption Cover for Losses from COVID-19?
Insurance & Risk Management
June 30, 2021 An Insurer’s Duty of Utmost Good Faith
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency Insurance & Risk Management
September 25, 2019 Damages for Disappointing Holiday
Insurance & Risk Management
September 25, 2019 Insurers to be Barred from Using Unfair Contracts
Insurance & Risk Management
November 07, 2018 Engine of Luxury Yacht Burns Out
Insurance & Risk Management
March 28, 2018 Who is Insured When the Whole Family Lives on the Farm?
Insurance & Risk Management
November 08, 2017 Australian Executor Trustee Ltd v Suncorp Life
Dispute Resolution & Insolvency Insurance & Risk Management
March 19, 2015 Omissions Must Cause or Contribute to Loss to Allow Rejection of Insurance Claims
Insurance & Risk Management